Benchmarking one lane is useful. Benchmarking your entire carrier portfolio is where procurement teams uncover their biggest opportunities for savings, stronger negotiations, and better allocation decisions.
Most procurement teams don't have just one ocean freight contract. They manage multiple carriers across dozens of trade lanes, each with its own contract terms, surcharge structures, amendment schedules, and service commitments.
That complexity makes benchmarking significantly harder than comparing a single rate against a market index. The question isn't simply whether one lane is competitive. It's whether your entire portfolio remains competitive as the market evolves.
The answer requires a structured approach.
Before comparing anything to the market, you need to understand what you're actually paying. That sounds straightforward. In practice, it rarely is. Each carrier structures rates differently.
Some bundle charges together. Others separate accessorials into multiple line items. Fuel, terminal handling, peak season, origin charges, destination charges, and other surcharges often follow different methodologies across carriers. Comparing only the base ocean freight rate can produce misleading conclusions.
Benchmarking begins by creating comparable, all-in rates across every carrier and lane. Only then are meaningful comparisons possible.
Once contracted rates have been normalized, the next step is comparing them against a trusted market benchmark. Until recently, that was difficult. Procurement teams relied on carrier quotes, anecdotal market commentary, or periodic RFQs to estimate where the market was trading.
Today, NYFI provides a trusted transaction-based benchmark built on actual shipped transactions. Built on actual shipped transactions and governed independently with equal representation from carriers, NVOCCs, and beneficial cargo owners, NYFI allows procurement teams to compare their contracted rates against where the market actually cleared.
That changes the conversation. Rather than asking whether one carrier's quote is lower than another's, procurement can evaluate every contracted lane against the same transaction-based benchmark.
The most valuable insights rarely come from a single lane. With NYFI as the common benchmark across every lane, patterns begin to emerge that are difficult to see when contracts are reviewed individually. You may discover:
Looking across the portfolio allows procurement teams to prioritize attention where it will have the greatest impact.
Not every difference requires intervention. Benchmarking should help procurement teams focus on the opportunities that matter most. Questions worth asking include:
Where are contracted rates materially above where NYFI shows the market clearing?
A portfolio view makes those priorities much easier to identify.
Benchmarking is not an annual exercise. Markets continue moving after contracts are signed. Capacity changes. Demand shifts. Surcharges evolve. A portfolio that was highly competitive six months ago may no longer be today.
The highest-performing procurement teams establish a regular benchmarking cadence, using NYFI as their ongoing market reference to monitor changing conditions throughout the life of their contracts rather than waiting for the next tender cycle.
The process itself is straightforward. Maintaining it consistently across an entire carrier portfolio is not. Every carrier amendment changes contracted rates. Surcharges update on different schedules. Meanwhile, NYFI publishes fresh market benchmarks each week, reflecting actual shipped transactions across the market.
To keep benchmarking current, procurement teams must continually reconcile two moving datasets: their own contracted rates and the market benchmark.
For organizations managing dozens of carriers and hundreds of active lanes, that quickly becomes a significant manual effort. As workloads increase, benchmarking often shifts from a continuous procurement discipline to an occasional project performed before a major renewal or annual tender.
That's when opportunities begin to disappear. Rates drift away from the market unnoticed. Carrier conversations happen later than they should. And procurement loses the continuous market visibility that benchmarking was intended to provide.
The process itself doesn't change. The amount of manual work does.
Contracted rates are normalized across carriers. Market benchmarks update continuously. Portfolio comparisons happen automatically rather than through spreadsheet reconciliation.
NYFI provides the trusted transaction-based benchmark.
NYSHEX Rate Management normalizes contracted carrier rates and keeps them current as amendments arrive.
NYSHEX Rate Intelligence continuously compares the two at the trade, subtrade, and lane level, allowing procurement teams to see where contracted rates have drifted above or below the market without rebuilding the analysis manually.
Instead of spending time maintaining spreadsheets, procurement teams can focus on the commercial decisions the data supports.
Benchmarking a carrier portfolio isn't about finding one perfect rate. It's about giving procurement teams continuous visibility into where contracts remain competitive, where market conditions have shifted, and where commercial conversations are likely to create the greatest value.
With a trusted benchmark built on actual shipped transactions, that process can become an ongoing procurement discipline rather than an annual exercise tied to the next tender.
or